Reply to Dermatology 1992;185:160

[Tribute to historical dermatology].

books by Gay Prieto and Gómez Orbaneja, since they meant so much in my time. I know they were followed by other prestigious dermatologists who also produced excellent publications but including these in the painting would have overextended the dimensions and motivation of the work. A notebook (11) contains the imaginary names of those who do not feature in the painting but who could be consider...

The Authors’ Reply

An Introduction to Dermatology

quality of the paper is better?smoother and not quite so "hog-skinned." We confess we do not like engravings from Photos ; the details, when magnified, compare very indifferently With true photographs, but these latter must doubtless have increased the cost of the work. The index is in clear, good Print, full, and very free from mistakes. I he text of the work is good, and contains few errors ;...

Introduction to Dermatology

An Introduction to Dermatology

In reviewing this book from the standpoint of the general practitioner or of one whose chief interest is not in Dermatology, one is immediately impressed with the great usefulness of this concise and graphic presentation of the subject. As the authors declare, the work is intended primarily for students, and the effort has been to produce a volume which would cover the fundamentals of Dermatolo...